18
Dec 24

Visiting the Museum of the American Revolution

For a grading break, and before an afternoon and early evening meeting, we went to the Museum of the American Revolution. It’s one of those things you wonder why I waited so long to do. And it’s one of those days where my lovely bride braced herself when she said, “What time should we go?” There was that meeting we had to attend, so we were backtiming the day.

I said I’d found that if you want to read things you could spend a three hours there.

And this is where it pays off to do things with a person who knows what’s in your heart, but are afraid to say out loud. This incredible woman bought tickets for 10 a.m., which would give us more than four hours at the museum.

Worth it. And we didn’t even get to see one of the rooms. But here’s a quick look at some of what we saw.

Outside, because of course you must start outside, there are modern brick walls, nondescript, but for this sculpture.

(This is the first of three panoramas in this post. And it’s beautiful. Click to embiggen.)

This is a really, really fine museum. But there are a few silly things. For tactile people, like me, there are a few things you can touch. You remember reading about the Stamp Act. Here’s an oversized stamp you can touch. It is made of plastic.

There are a few areas where they’re trying to create an immersive experience. You walk under a recreation of a Liberty Tree, where you can touch a bit of wood salvaged (and preserved) from an actual Liberty Tree, the last surviving Liberty Tree, which was felled by a hurricane in 1999 in Maryland.

Pasted up in some of those areas are reproductions of handbills that the revolutionary-era people might have seen. This one was printed by E. Russell, who notes his shop is set up “next the Cornfield, Union-street.”

E. Russell was Ezekiel Russell, a printer of minor importance. He apprenticed under his brother, and then bounced around New England trying to make his business work. For a time he dabbled in auctioneering, but he returned to slinging the lead. He wrote a royalist publication for a time, but history seems to think that he just needed the money. Most of his work is remembered as small pamphlets. His wife, Sarah Russell worked in the print shop, and took over the business after he died in 1796. She’s remembered as a pioneer of female publishing.

And before we get too far into this, let me direct you to Museum’s site, for a look at what they consider the crown jewel of the collection, which they don’t let allow you to photograph, George Washington’s war tent. It’s a living piece of history, lived in during war and well documented in peace, it is a piece of linen that’s 250 years old, so there’s no flashes or bright lights allowed.

You’ll see a few glimpses of it, and the mini-doc that visitors watch before seeing the tent, in this video.

Washington didn’t sleep in it every night during the war, but that tent got it’s share of use. It makes sense that this is well protected, but you still want to walk under those flaps when you see it. You want to stand there, and try to understand the sense of the size of the space, and the great men — scared, cold, hungry, determined — that stood there.

This is the second panorama in the post, and this is thought to be George Washington’s sword. And, remarkably, it’s just … sitting there.

(Click to embiggen.)

When they read the Declaration of Independence in New York City on July 9, 1776, some of the soldiers and sailors tore down symbols of the king. British flags, tavern signs, the royal insignia, were all removed. Including a statue of George III, that had been sculpted in London. Much of the statue — he’d been riding a horse, wearing a Roman-style toga — was carried off to Connecticut and melted into musket balls, some 42,000 in all. A few fragments of the statue survived.

They’ve dug some musket balls out of a few battlefields that matched the composition of lead and tin here, so historians think some of this statue was sent back to the British in anger.

The Declaration of Independence was distributed, by design and format, as a fragile thing. John Dunlap was the original printer, in Philadelphia. It is thought that he printed about 200, some of them in great haste. Just 26 copies of the Dunlap broadsides are known to survive. (Including one that was found behind a painting picked up for $4 at a flea market in 1989!) The Library of Congress has two of the Dunlap originals, and only one of those is complete.

I got to see one of the Dunlap broadsides in a museum exhibit in 2003. No photographs allowed.

This is not a Dunlap broadside.

John Gill, Edward E. Powars, and Nathaniel Willis printed the first copies of the Declaration in Boston, both in newspapers and in this broadside. This is a second printing of the Gill and Powars broadside. (The bottom line is the differentiating clue.)

Historians don’t know how many of their broadsides were made or survive. But you can still go to the print shop when you’re in Boston. (I’m going there.) A master printer, Gary Gregory, does historical reproductions in the traditional style. (I’m going to talk him into letting me print a copy.)

Ssshhhhh … I think this one is a reproduction, but it is historically faithful version of that second printing. It even has the Gill and Powars errors off the Dunlap original. I wonder how much thought the museum or other experts give to the amount of creases and wear should be worked into reproductions.

General Hugh Mercer fought and was killed at the Battle of Princeton. Born in Scotland, Mercer was a surgeon during the Jacobin uprising in his homeland. He fled to Pennsylvania, in 1747, after the Jacobites were put down. He worked as an apothecary, and then served in the French and Indian War in the 1750s. He was wounded twice, once badly, and he became George Washington’s lifelong friend, moving to Virginia to dispense medicine there, and then came the American Revolution, where he quickly was appointed as a general in the Pennsylvania militia.

He and his men, a vanguard of some 350 soldiers, ran across two British regiments and some attached cavalry. Mercer’s horse was shot from under him. The British thought he was Washington, and so they moved in and demanded he surrender. Mercer, instead, drew his sword. He was bayoneted seven times and left for dead.

You’ve seen the painting that commemorates his death. And maybe history is like that sometimes. A high profile person was killed, and he was well-liked enough to become the centerpiece of John Turnbull’s first war painting. (When you look at the painting, you see Washington arriving on horseback. In the foreground Mercer was wounded. But you don’t see Hugh’s face. Turnbull used Mercer’s son, Hugh Jr., as a model.)

Mercer survived the battlefield. He lived, in agony, for a little more than a week. He gave this sword to his friend and adjutant, a Welshman named Jacob Morgan, and it stayed in their family for two generations. The photo above, the sword is paired with a bayonet that belonged to one of the units that Mercer ran across on that fateful day.

This is the hilt of his sword, posthumously engraved.

Sword of General Hugh Mercer of the Revolutionary Army born in Aberdeen Scotland 1725 He came to Philadelphia from Scotland in 1746. Died January 12 1777 of wounds received at the Battle of Princeton, N.J.

A handsome, large weapons display. Touch the screens to learn about each of the items in this giant case.

On the left you see weapons that were commonly in action from 1775 to 1777. Some, the display notes, were local, some captured, some left over from previous conflicts. On the right are weapons that show up later in the war, including some standardized French weapons were so important in the fighting.

I wonder if historians and docents got a little giddy putting all of those things on display.

And why is this humble little canteen just as intriguing?

The UStates branding suggests it belonged to the Continental Army, somewhere around 1777. The other initials might be people who carried the thing.

The every day items are just as fascinating as all of the big ticket items here.

These buttons adorned soldiers’ coats. They also date to 1777.

The museum then, note that gunpowder casks in 1776 also were stamped with USA, but these coat buttons, 25 per coat, were the first widespread use.

Archeologists found these all over the place at Valley Forge and other camps.

There’s a naval section. More pamphlets set the scene.

Here, friend, learn this MANLY SONG, and then join the American fleet. “A privateering we will go my boys, a privateering we will go!”

I wonder when they had time to do much sailing, singing 10 verses of this MANLY SONG. You know it’s MANLY because of all of the bravely dying and cheerfully dying going on in this song. Between this, and my 2009 experience learning about what life was like aboard the U.S.S. Constitution I don’t think the sailor’s life would have been for me.

Some people take to it naturally, however …

This is a faithful reproduction of the bow of a privateer vessel, built by Independence Seaport Museum’s boat-building workshop, Workshop on the Water.

That exhibit tells of 14-year-old free African American James Forten who volunteered aboard a privateer ship. He survived the war, became a prominent abolitionist, a wealthy Philadelphia businessman and the head of a hugely prominent regional family name.

This is the flag of the 2nd Spartan Regiment of South Carolina. The sign says that this is the first time it has been displayed since it flew over arms.

This sword belonged to Maj. Gen. Benjamin Lincoln, Washington’s second-in-command at Yorktown. Yorktown was where the British surrendered, you might recall. When General Cornwallis sent his second-in-command to surrender, Washington sent Lincoln to receive him.

This is a panorama.

(Click to embiggen.)

One of my ancestors, a great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather according to online genealogy, was at Yorktown. He was born in 1751 in colonial Virginia, served twice in the militia and helped guard an estimated 500 British prisoners after they quit the field in Yorktown.

There’s also an ax head on display with Lincoln’s sword. The continental soldiers used axes like that to chop their way through British fortifications at Yorktown. (If you were wondering, Benjamin Lincoln was apparently the fourth cousin, three times removed, of Abraham Lincoln through his mother’s side.)

These beautiful buttons, the sign says, were sold as souvenirs of George Washington’s 1789 inauguration as president. They were sewn onto clothing.

Don’t you want a copy of each of those? (Real ones, of course. Not repros. Never repros.)

Just read the text on this sign. Go ahead and read it. I’ll be waiting on the other side of the photo.

“Charges spread through the partisan press that the state’s inclusive voter laws encouraged election fraud.”

We’ve been fighting this same stupid “Can’t let ’em vote, that’s how cheating happens” battle for more than 200 years. We’ve been fighting it because it is powerfully effective rhetoric. It’s nothing more than that, but still we are fighting it.

At the end of the part of the museum we saw — because we didn’t get to see everything today, despite four hours! — there was a section of digitized reproductions of photographs of Revolutionary War era Americans. (Much later in life, obviously.)

Jonathan Harrington had seem some things. (And if I knew this story beforehand I would taken a more careful photo.) Harrington was, at 16, a fifer in a company at the battles of Lexington and Concord. His uncle and namesake was killed at Lexington, the boy escaped, only to rally and reengage the enemy soon after.

There are no further reports of him taking part in any battles after Concord. He married two years later, and had as many as eight children. He was, apparently, the only witness of the first shot of the Revolution to be photographed. (There’s a bit more about the Harringtons, and the women of Lexington, here.)

And, lastly, Daniel Bakeman, at a remarkable 109, was the last survivor receiving a veteran’s pension for service in the American Revolutionary War. If you believe his story, that is. It seems he might have served in some militia units. And then was a teamster for the military, then became a farmer in New York.

He had difficulty proving his service, but was eventually judged credible for pension purposes. Congress, on February 14, 1867, passed a special act which granted Bakeman a pension of $500 a year. Presumably he collected that twice before dying in 1869. Two other men were his last contemporaries to be pensioned for the Revolutionary War. By that point in the late 1860s the government was busy fending off requests from Civil War soldiers. (We have a history of treating our patriots poorly.)

My (apparently) great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather was not on the photo display. Of course I looked. But here he is.

He is buried in Illinois, in some woods between two fields, an all-but-forgotten family plot, I’d guess. He was laid to rest in a place that, even now, is quite rural. That photo, if it is indeed the man, would have been taken sometime in the first five years of the Daguerreotype style of photographs, and he would have been between 89 and 93 there.

The Museum of the American Revolution, my lovely bride’s idea, is fantastic. When you go, let me know. I’ll definitely go back.


17
Dec 24

The grading is going well

Two of my classes are now completed! Except for the grading, which I am doing now. At midnight the submission window closed, and students had a final essay exam and a critical study of a social media platform to get in before that deadline. Now I’m just working my way through three dozen essays and as many audits.

That’s roughly 300-plus pages of material to read through this week, plus two other classes that will continue for one more week beyond. So, guess what! This is another light week!

But, hey, the grass is still bright and green in mid-December, and in the middle of a serious drought!

I went outside just to take that photo. I’d gone downstairs for a late lunch, looked out the southwestern facing window and saw that wonderfully verdant view.

While I was out there, this flew overhead.

Those aren’t drones. That’s maneuvers! These aren’t drones, either.

This joke will never not be funny.

Back to work, then.


16
Dec 24

Noisy videos

We aren’t getting drones. We are seeing flyovers from the Royal Canadian Air Force and advance elements of the 38th wing of Canada geese. They make a delightful racket.

(Delightful because they just fly right by. Keep it moving, geese.)

  

That was Saturday. Saturday night, if you’ll excuse the quality of the shot, Santa came through the neighborhood.

  

They do that every year. Isn’t that charming?


13
Dec 24

Sentimentality

Since it falls on Sunday this year, I’ll just go ahead and acknowledge the date today. Sixteen years ago, Sunday, this happened.

It took place right under this tree. That’s Our Tree, in Savannah. Every time we go there, we go back to the park and sit right there, beneath it’s beautiful branches.

(Click to embiggen.)

I hope Our Tree is having a season of it. I hope we go back soon, and the sun is warm, the breeze is a delight and the ground is dry enough to lay upon all day.


12
Dec 24

Descartes on moss

On the patio we have an open rectangle, a three sided affair of blocks that stack about hip high in a basic symmetrical design. Inside of that rectangle sits the grill, which we will use less and less as the nights turn colder. The grill is covered and, on especially windy days, I’ll sit a heavy wrought iron chair in front of it, and just on the edge of the cover, hoping to keep it in place.

The grill faces two tables, which always speak to the promise of gatherings and parties and loud and peaceful nights outside in the best of seasons. And beyond are peaceful views of the treelines, the neighbor’s roofs, and so on. On the other side of the grill is a vibrant mishmash of plants from all over. Not all of them are native, but everything seems to prosper here in the soil here, where the heavy land and the green sands meet.

I say that because, just beyond the treeline behind us, just atop this tiny little hill, those soil types come together, a clash and a marriage of ancient geological forces that seem frozen to our human conceptions of time, but are really just passing through and alongside one another over the course of the geological history of everything.

My agronomy professors would be pleased.

Unknown to all of that, and behind that grill, and atop those stones, is this little patch of moss.

I could clean that off. Maybe I should.

But the current thinking is that moss could have been a part of ancient ice ages, some 470 million years ago. It spread on land, the thinking goes, absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, dissolved, formed and altered rocks, which released significant amounts of phosphorus and iron which ended up in the oceans, where it caused massive algal blooms, taking more CO2 from the atmosphere. Then it is a chain of consequences. Small organisms feeding on the nutrients, leaving large areas without oxygen, which caused a mass extinction of marine species, meanwhile the levels of CO2 dropped all over the world, allowing the formation of ice caps on the poles and a few weeks later, we showed up, quoting Descartes and watching Friends.

Moss has long had medicinal purposes around here. The indigenous people at various times used it for bedding, diapers, and first aid, like wound dressing. That was still done through World War I because the stuff can just absorb moisture like someone reading Descartes for the first time. In other times in other parts of the world, it was once a foodstuff. It still has commercial uses. Why would you want to remove something as important as all that?

Someone, and I’m not naming names, picked up a supply of paper products made by people determined to upset the paper product paradigm.

What’s with this wavy perforation pattern?

It apparently started last year and has just now found its way to us. It is an attempt to solve the top problem consumers have … the incomplete tear.

We’ve really stumbled upon a moment in human society here.

If you thought I would go back to Descartes, well, you were right. But he takes us a different way.

I did say that there was some difficulty in expelling from our belief everything we have previously accepted. One reason for this is that before we can decide to doubt, we need some reason for doubting; and that is why in my First Meditation I put forward the principal reasons for doubt. (Replies 5, appendix, AT 9a:204, CSM 2:270)

He makes it clear that we should not extend hyperbolic doubt to practical matters:

I made a very careful distinction between the conduct of life and the contemplation of the truth. As far as the conduct of life is concerned, I am very far from thinking that we should assent only to what is clearly perceived. … from time to time we will have to choose one of many alternatives about which we have no knowledge … (Replies 2, AT 7:149, CSM 2:106)

The man was a 17th century genius philosopher and mathematician. If you try to look up his thoughts on toilet paper … you’ll be disappointed. He also couldn’t handle criticism, and suggested some of his contemporaries work would be best left to the privy.

Less messy than the moss, one supposes.